Sports Added Here Starting August 1st

OFFICIALLY on August 1st this BLOG will turn into a SPORTS BLOG several days a week.

 

It will not be ALL sports as one or two days, depending on how I feel, I will add content of other kinds.

 

My thoughts from the month of July was not of interest to many people. For the past 4 days this BLOG had less than 10 readers each day.

SPORTS may not get many more than that but I have more avenues to market it .

 

Thanks for the READERSHIP for July.

I have TWO MORE days of political blogs and about 8 more to put up.

 

Thanks

 

Tom

Now Starring as Robin Hood-  Illinois Governor Pat Quinn

      Now Starring as Robin Hood-  Illinois Governor Pat Quinn

Democrat Gov. Pat Quinn today signed into law a measure to put a non-binding referendum on the fall ballot asking voters whether millionaires should be taxed at a higher rate.

I know we are looking for avenues to put money into the coffers of the State of Illinois. This proposal is expected to raise over $1 billion and it is promised to help education. That is great, fine and dandy.

Three thoughts that come to mind on this law. A non-binding referendum is diddly-squat. Michael Madigan wanted to propose this as a constitutional amendment but couldn’t muster the votes. There probably was a reason for that.

I have heard this mantra from several former governors that the money is going to education. The lottery certainly failed to find its way into that realm after it was promised.

There is a final thought. This referendum is expected to drive up the number of Democratic voters in the election which is likely to help Quinn, if that is a fact.

Source: Illinois Times

 

The opinions in this blog belong to Tom Knuppel

National Security is Threated By Not Filling Ambassadorships

     National Security is Threated By Not Filling Ambassadorships

 

Currently, more than 40 U.S. embassies around the world are without ambassadors, threatening national security, according to Seattle  Times guest columnists Claudia Kennedy and Stephen A. Cheney.

National security should never be a partisan issue. During our years of service, we worked with diplomats appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents. The Senate has gone away from traditional cooperation along party lines and is holding up the confirmations of multiple nominees that are well qualified.

Recently, Democrats and Republicans have traded charges and countercharges about the long delays in confirming ambassadors. But there is no doubt that the problem stems from a polarized and broken Senate confirmation system. Many of the nominees for ambassador positions are career diplomats as opposed to political appointees. A start to dislodging the logjam would be to confirm those appointments quickly. That isn’t to say, of course, that the Senate shouldn’t move to confirm all of the nominees. Presidents of both parties have always appointed a mix of career foreign service personnel and political supporters to ambassadorships. But starting with the career diplomats might get things moving.

As Republicans and Democrats have said over the years, political differences end at our shores. It is time for Senate Republicans and Democrats alike to prove that these are more than empty words. It is time for them to revisit the oath of office they took when they were sworn in, and to faithfully discharge the duties of their office. It is time for them to approve our ambassadors and restore the stature of our foreign missions.

 

The opinions in this blog are those of Tom Knuppel

The United States: Forgetting What History Can Teach Us

          The United States: Forgetting What History Can Teach Us

 

Think back to your U. S. History class and think about what you learn about the Sedition Act. I think you just smiled and told me you don’t remember anything about it or just that you know it deals with espionage. So let’s review what the Sedition Act involves.

“An act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States.” Approved July 14, 1798. Wikipedia lists it as:

SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled. That if any persons shall unlawfully combine or conspire together, with intent to oppose any measure or measures of the government of the United States, which are or shall be directed by proper authority, or to impede the operation of any law of the United States, or to intimidate or prevent any person holding a place or office in or under the government of the United States, from undertaking, performing, or executing his trust or duty: and if any person or persons, with intent as aforesaid, shall counsel, advise, or attempt to procure any insurrection, riot, unlawful assembly, or combination, whether such conspiracy, threatening, counsel, advice, or attempt shall have the proposed effect or not, he or they shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanour, and on conviction before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, and by imprisonment during a term of not less than six months, nor exceeding five years; and further, at the discretion of the court, may be holden to find sureties for his good behaviour, in such sum, and for such time, as the said court may direct.

SECT. 2. And be it further enacted, That if any person shall write, print, utter, or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered, or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering, or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either House of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or either House of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States, or to stir up sedition within the United States; or to excite any unlawful combinations therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the United States, or any act of the President of the United States, done in pursuance of any such law, or of the powers in him vested by the Constitution of the United States; or to resist, oppose, or defeat any such law or act; or to aid, encourage or abet any hostile designs of any foreign nation against the United States, their people or government, then such person, being thereof convicted before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years.

SECT. 3. And be it further enacted and declared, That if any person shall be prosecuted under this act for the writing or publishing any libel aforesaid, it shall be lawful for the defendant, upon the trial of the cause, to give in evidence in his defence, the truth of the matter contained in the publication charged as a libel. And the jury who shall try the cause shall have a right to determine the law and the fact, under the direction of the court, as in other cases.

SECT. 4. And be it further enacted, That this act shall continue and be in force until the third day of March, one thousand eight hundred and one, and no longer: Provided, That the expiration of the act shall not prevent or defeat a prosecution and punishment of any offence against the law, during the time it shall be in force.

We just passed the 216th anniversary year of this Act. With any law, rule or act, they are there to improve the country and many expect it to change the spectrum of the country. But let’s face it, we have learned NOTHING.

The History Channel has been providing stories dealing with the Sedition Act all week.

The story begins with the prosecution of Samuel Jordan Cabell, an event that prompted Thomas Jefferson to set down on paper the principles of nullification in the Kentucky Resolutions. Cabell was a congressman representing Thomas Jefferson’s home district in Virginia. In May 1797, a grand jury returned a presentment of libel against Cabell (incidentally, as a delegate to the Virginia ratifying convention, Cabell voted against ratification of the Constitution). What was Cabell’s crime? He sent a letter to constituents criticizing the administration of John Adams. That’s it. That was the sum of his seditious plot. A letter to voters in his district calling out some act of the president with which he disagreed. For this effrontery to his authority, John Adams charged Cabell with “endeavoring at a time of real public danger to disseminate unfounded calumnies against the happy government of the United States.”

Are you paying attention? Does this sound like today? This could have happened last week according to the way it is written. It’s probably because we live in a time when the three branches of the federal government have managed to place themselves above reproach and above the law.

To help them reach that lofty perch, public schools and media have trained generations of Americans to believe that we must look to Washington, D.C. for our salvation. If the federal government ignores the plea, we must meekly accept the decision without question, especially when the Supreme Court rules that the federal position is now “settled law.”

 

This is not new as it has been going on for over 200 years.

Remember, “we the people”

Who Gets to Live in the Women’s Dorms?

Transgenders Create New Questions

 

What decides a person’s gender? For that matter, who gets to decide? This, along with a few other problems, have emerged for college officials as a growing number of transgender students are attempting to force the question.

A growing number of openly transgender students have forced schools around the country to address questions so basic that they were rarely asked just a few years ago, much less answered: What defines a person’s gender, and who gets to decide?

There was an article that caught my attention as I was reading the Atlanta Journal Constitution on Friday, July 25th. It shared some of the issues colleges are facing that didn’t exist a few years ago.

In Oregon, there is a small Christian College that has told a student that was born anatomically a female, and calls himself a man, that he/she can’t be housed in the male dorm and must be in the female dorm. He has legally had his sex changed by the State. With the refusal, the college did offer him a single-person apartment on campus, or off-campus housing.

Another case involves a student in California that was settled when the federal government adopted the position that under Title IX, they barred sex-abuse discrimination and the school must accept a student’s gender self-identification.

In Maine, the highest court ruled that state law requires the same thing but other courts have disagreed. In 2009, the courts ruled a school could ban a transgender woman from using the women’s restroom because the intent was to protect the privacy of other women not to discriminate.

It soon will be time to send college students back to their dorms for another year. How do you think colleges should handle this delicate issue?

 

The opinions in this blog belong to Tom Knuppel

 

Big Ten Picks Preseason Selections from Media Day Writers

     Big Ten Picks Preseason Selections from Media Day Writers

 

Here are the winners and runner-ups from the Big Ten media day writers: (number of votes in parentheses)

 

QUARTERBACK

Braxton Miller, Ohio State (13 votes)

Christian Hackenberg, Penn State (1)

RUNNING BACK

Melvin Gordon, Wisconsin (13)

Ameer Abdullah, Nebraska (12)

WIDE RECEIVER

Stefon Diggs, Maryland (12)

Devin Funchess, Michigan (7)

TIGHT END

Jeff Heuerman, Ohio State (7)

Tyler Kroft, Rutgers (3)

CENTER

Jack Allen, Michigan State (10)

Dan Voltz, Wisconsin (2)

GUARD

Zac Epping, Minnesota (7)

Kyle Costigan, Wisconsin (6)

TACKLE

Brandon Scherff, Iowa (14)

Rob Havenstein, Wisconsin (9)

KICKER

Michael Geiger, Michigan State (11)

Brad Craddock, Maryland (2)

***

DEFENSIVE LINE

Shilique Calhoun, Michigan State (14)

Randy Gregory, Nebraska (14)

LINEBACKER

Jake Ryan, Michigan (13)

Chi Chi Ariguzo, Northwestern (10)

 

DEFENSIVE BACK

Kurtis Drummond, Michigan State (14)

Blake Countess, Michigan (9)

PUNTER

Mike Sadler, Michigan State (9)

Cameron Johnston, Ohio State (4)

COACH OF THE YEAR

Urban Meyer, Ohio State (6)

Mark Dantonio, Michigan State; Gary Andersen, Wisconsin (3)

OFFENSIVE PLAYER OF THE YEAR

Braxton Miller, Ohio State (11)

Melvin Gordon, Wisconsin (2)

DEFENSIVE PLAYER OF THE YEAR

Shilique Calhoun, Michigan State (7)

Randy Gregory, Nebraska (5)

FRESHMAN OF THE YEAR

Jabrill Peppers, Michigan (11)

Why Don’t NFL Teams Train Where They Play?

Why Don’t NFL Train at Home?

I can understand any team that has a dome like the Rams having issues playing at home. It is a possibility they can rent those facilities for concerts and other activities. But why don’t team practice where they play?

Here is part of an article from the Kansas City Star:

Chiefs chairman Clark Hunt said on Saturday that the club will decide whether to continue training camp at Missouri Western State University by the end of the calendar year.

Nineteen of the NFL’s 32 teams now train at their own facilities, and it’s a possibility the Chiefs will follow that trend in 2015.

Why not practice at Arrowhead Stadium? Why can’t the Bears practice at Soldier Field? Do the Bears own that facility?

Why rent a facility that is miles from home base?

It appears 13 teams do that.

Thoughts?

Expectations Tempered for SLU Hoops

 

Last season the Billikens made a run in the NCAA tourney but those days are gone. SLU has lost five seniors that all had experience. This season will be a rebuild for Coach Jim Crews. Now he has six incoming freshman to work on that rebuild.

Three guards, Devell Roby, Miles Reynolds and Marcus Bartley will learn the frontcourt duties while forwards Brett Jolly and Malik Yarbrough will man the boards. Center Austin Gilman will put his name into the middle of the lane to be counted on.

Grandy Glaze, 6’6” Forward will be the only returnee with experience. Things will be tough for the Billikens.

The World Needs Kindness, Not Just Niceness

The World Needs Kindness, Not Just Niceness

Why can’t our society spend more time in reaching out and smother the world with kindness. I didn’t say niceness because there is a fundamental difference in the two words. Niceness is something that non-Christians do between Thanksgiving and Christmas by adding to the kettles that are asking for money. Niceness can be raising billions for the homeless and putting programs together for drug addicts. Niceness is a human quality and kindness is divine quality. Kindness has to originate in the heart of God. This truth means that only Christians have the ability to be kind.

Many of us want to be kind. We want that. We may struggle with that but have to seek God for that quality. It is not some that just comes to us.

In the book Changing the World Through Kindness they state about kindness:

It isn’t fast. We are enamored with fast, the big and the spectacular. It will not “just happen” for us.

It isn’t easy. It takes time and energy to be kind and that means we find it difficult to actually go beyond our feelings of benevolence to take action. Face it, our schedules are full and if we start being kind it can simply overwhelm us.

It isn’t natural. We are not wired that way. The world doesn’t come across as warm and fuzzy. We have to work at it. It will take the Holy Spirit’s transforming presence to get it done.

It isn’t ego-building. We make the mistake that God is counting on us to get a certain point across and that is far from the truth. We are prone to over-emphasizing our role in the gospel and under-emphasizing God’s role. Doing acts of kindness is a good way to humble ourselves.

It isn’t easy to qualify. We like to see evidence/proof. Some of the most dynamic things in God’s economy are tough to quantify. The proof is in the pudding, as they say. But we can’t measure the impact for the most part.

When the climate of God’s love and presence is evident among a group of people, spiritual barriers crumble, old ways of thinking change, and people come to know him as he really is.

It is time to act on Kindness.

Non-Christians respond to kindness, remember kindness, rehearse their conversion and repent when they are show kindness.

Ephesians 4:32 –“Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.”

 

The opinions in this blog belong to Tom Knuppel

This Might “Creep You Out” – A Good Gone Bad

          This Might “Creep You Out” – A Good Gone Bad

Some people just have good intention and something turns terribly wrong. This is the case of a lady on California that wanted to do a good but got her neighborhood to consider it “creepy”.

A woman had issues when she anonymously left porcelain dolls with fuzzy slippers and frilly gowns on the doorstep of her friends from church. The dolls were said to eerily resemble the daughters that were at the homes that she left them to be discovered.

 

The woman didn’t plan to scare anyone and was quoted to say she was embarrassed to have so  much made commotion over it. The police researched the drop-off and found the woman.

The police that investigated said, “She felt like some of the girls would enjoy the dolls,”

The woman had daughters of her own that were too old to play with them she she tried to match the children with the hair color and eye color of the doll.

No charges were filed.