Media… Article from the Daily Vidette (ISU)

 

 

The following article was written by the Editorial Board of the Daily Vidette at Illinois State University.

I didn’t write this but fully agree with their thoughts.

 

 

People who are passionate about any current event, social issue or government policy would likely claim to have unique views and insights about the topic in question. There is no doubt that people get concerned about public issues for good reasons, but do people really choose what to be interested in? For most Americans, their interest on an issue depends almost completely on how much media attention it receives.

The fact that mass media can control people’s interests and concerns is troubling. There is a direct correlation between how much media coverage a topic gets and the amount of public interest for related issues. People may also base their opinions on very little information. Sound bites are shorter than ever, people trust Buzzfeed for news and many get their news from Twitter headlines (neglecting to click the link to the full article).

When the media has so much influence over the public’s opinions and concerns, it is disturbing just how biased news outlets can be. People often go to the news outlet that will reinforce their way of thinking, raising public polarization of opinion. When biased news organizations like MSNBC and Fox News use their influence to focus public interest on certain issues and back them up with unfair reporting, it erodes the public’s ability to make their own judgments. These news outlets don’t trust our ability to make decisions; if they did, they would provide us with fair and unbiased reporting.

At least when the media is covering political and social issues, people pay attention to things that matter. In recent years, however, news organizations that are taken seriously often stray from hard news and focus on entertainment. This creates an entirely new problem where the media shifts the public’s attention away from the pressing subjects of the day. This may be why many people know more about Kanye West’s 2020 platform than those of the current 2016 presidential candidates. A great example is the now famous incident where MSNBC cut into an interview about the NSA to cover Justin Bieber’s arrest.

When the media controls interest on important issues and events, key topics do not get attention for long enough. The model of many major news outlets is to keep the new material coming before people get bored and lose interest. This creates an uninformed public with short attention spans. There is often not enough time for people to fully digest an issue and make an informed opinion of it before moving on to the next one.

We need to be careful where we get our news. We need to pay attention to make sure we are receiving news that is unbiased, thoughtful and in-depth. In a world where the media controls public interest, we must make sure we are receiving the best information.

 

It’s Called Hard Work…. not “You’re Just Smart”

 

 

 

 

 

Kids are back in school and beginning their routine for success. Many times people will tell a student that gets good grades that they are “just smart” and it comes easily to them.

That is a slap in the face.

 

People want to be viewed as intelligent. Everyone  loves being associated with the adjective smart, and I, in turn, also have complimented others’ intelligences freely. It wasn’t until later that I realized how damaging and invalidating that simple praise could be.

Some people would try to take the hardest class of any subject they were remotely interested in, sacrifice time with friends and family to study and stay up late to get the grade desired. They wanted people to instantly think of “smart” when they thought of them.

As one gets older, however, being called smart no longer makes them feel accomplished, but rather seemed to degrade all their hard work and effort. Although it was meant as a compliment, “smart” became an excuse that described how success was achieved.

“Of course you got an A,” people said about high level classes. “You’re smart.” With that sentence, they discredited all the nights that were put in with only four hours of sleep because of studying. Instead, they attributed the grade to a single trait.

Smart isn’t just an excuse for successes, but also became an attempted condolence when one fails.

 

Following Stanford professor Carol Dweck’s research on motivation and mindset, the difference between praise for effort and praise for ability is significant. People who are used to their abilities being praised usually experience lower task persistence and enjoyment. They also experience increased negative self-affect and self-cognition.

On the other hand, praise for effort increases task enjoyment and performance. The praised demonstrate greater persistence in face of failure. Improving is more plausible when intelligence is viewed as malleable rather than fixed.

Being known as “smart” no longer flatters but  adds on to the pressure felt. People much rather prefer acknowledgement of to their efforts than to the simple, yet destructive, adjective “smart.”

Be Careful What the Public Deems Sacred

 

So much has happened in the news lately in terms of freedom of expression and the abuse of power. As individuals, we look for guidance in leaders and mentors. But when those in power lead us astray, how are we to know?

In my opinion, it is dangerous to leave anything sacred to the public, but it is also dangerous for an individual to leave nothing sacred to themselves.

When a concept is sacred to an individual, it opens the door for necessary contemplation of ethics, morality, and priority. A concept left sacred to the public, however, gives said concept power over the people, a situation that I think is risky enough that it should be avoided.
One of the latest examples of this, of course, was the controversial release of the film, “The Interview”. I’ve heard opinions from both sides of the spectrum, with some saying that Sony never should have prevented the movie from being shown in theaters, and others saying the movie should never have been made in the first place.
I can see the reasoning behind both sides. On one hand, we, as a people who believe in freedom of expression, should never let fear or threats from a governmental power keep us from that freedom. On the other hand, there are people who hold certain things sacred, and we should respect those things.
This is why I believe the concept of sacristy should be held firstly on an individual level. In North Korea, Kim Jong Un and his predecessors have been held on a level of sacredness that prevents them from being ridiculed, overthrown, analyzed, or questioned by their people. And it just so happens that this government does not feed its people the whole truth, or any truth at all. That is a dangerous concept. In the United States, we seem to be on the opposite side. Even on an individual level, many people hold nothing sacred, which I don’t necessarily think is a good idea either, but that is beside the point.

The important thing is that, as a nation, nothing has been allowed to be sacred, and while that may sound dismal, it gives us as a people the opportunity to dissect, debate, and analyze ideas that we as individuals hold dear to our hearts. It keeps institutions from becoming corrupted while they still have power over us. I’m not arguing that all institutions are inherently evil and brainwashing, but I do believe that any institution can become corrupted, and if we as a group hold that institution sacred already, it is much harder to stand up as an individual and break away from that power.
Again, I want to advocate for still keeping things sacred on an individual level. It is people who hold life sacred, and people who hold the power to choose sacred, that debate and pass laws related to abortion. It is people who hold justice sacred that keep our communities safe. It is also people who keep our communities safe that sometimes abuse that power. And if we as a group or community hold our leaders – whether local or national, religious or political – sacred, that abuse is allowed to continue on. We must remember what is sacred to us to give our life purpose and drive, but we must never give our individual convictions the power to control people who don’t want it.

Marketing the 2019 College Graduates- Their View of Things

 

 

First, I didn’t write this list. It came from the Beloit College Mindset List.

 

For marketers, it offers fascinating insights into the next generation of consumers – which makes it must reading for anyone creating a marketing strategy that targets students or young adults.

 

  1. They have a completely different view of electronic communication than their parents: Email is a “formal” communication while casual communication takes place in texts and tweets.
  2. Online search is a given: Google has always existed in their lifetimes.
  3. Their world is multicultural: CNN has always been available en Español.
  4. Time references are different: “Turn of the century” means the year 2000 to this group, not 1900.
  5. They have a different visual frame of reference for video: TV has always been in HD.
  6. Their own lives have always been recorded on video.
  7. They have grown up expecting access to Wi-Fi.
  8. Teachers have always had to insist that term papers employ sources in addition to those found online.
  9. Cultural icons instantly recognizable to adults were dead before this class was born, including Princess Diana, Notorious B.I.G., Jacques Cousteau, and Mother Theresa.
  10. And this one that really hit me as a direct marketer: They’ve never licked a postage stamp.

Here is the complete list (some duplicates):

Students heading into their first year of college this year are mostly 18 and were born in 1997.

Among those who have never been alive in their lifetimes are Princess Diana, Notorious B.I.G., Jacques Cousteau, and Mother Teresa.

Joining them in the world the year they were born were Dolly the sheep, The McCaughey septuplets, and Michael “Prince” Jackson Jr.

Since they have been on the planet:

1. Hybrid automobiles have always been mass produced.

2. Google has always been there, in its founding words, “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible.”

3. They have never licked a postage stamp.

4. Email has become the new “formal” communication, while texts and tweets remain enclaves for the casual.

5. Four foul-mouthed kids have always been playing in South Park.

6. Hong Kong has always been under Chinese rule.

7. They have grown up treating Wi-Fi as an entitlement.

8. The NCAA has always had a precise means to determine a national champion in college football.

9. The announcement of someone being the “first woman” to hold a position has only impressed their parents.

10. Charlton Heston is recognized for waving a rifle over his head as much as for waving his staff over the Red Sea.

11. Color photos have always adorned the front page of The New York Times.

12. Ellis Island has always been primarily in New Jersey.

13. “No means no” has always been morphing, slowly, into “only yes means yes.”

14. Cell phones have become so ubiquitous in class that teachers don’t know which students are using them to take notes and which ones are planning a party.

15. The Airport in Washington, D.C., has always been Reagan National Airport.

16. Their parents have gone from encouraging them to use the Internet to begging them to get off it.

17. If you say “around the turn of the century,” they may well ask you, “which one?”

18. They have avidly joined Harry Potter, Ron, and Hermione as they built their reading skills through all seven volumes.

19. Attempts at human cloning have never been federally funded but do require FDA approval.

20. “Crosstown Classic” and the “Battle of the Bay” have always been among the most popular interleague rivalries in Major League Baseball.

21. Carry Me Back to Old Virginny has never been the official song of the Virginia Commonwealth.

22. Phish Food has always been available from Ben and Jerry.

23. Kyoto has always symbolized inactivity about global climate change.

24. When they were born, cell phone usage was so expensive that families only used their large phones, usually in cars, for emergencies.

25. The therapeutic use of marijuana has always been legal in a growing number of American states.

26. The eyes of Texas have never looked upon The Houston Oilers.

27. Teachers have always had to insist that term papers employ sources in addition to those found online.

28. In a world of DNA testing, the Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington has never included a Vietnam War veteran “known only to God.”

29. Playhouse Disney was a place where they could play growing up.

30. Surgeons have always used “super glue” in the operating room.

31. Fifteen nations have always been constructing the International Space Station.

32. The Lion King has always been on Broadway.

33. Phoenix Lights is a series of UFO sightings, not a filtered cigarette.

34. Scotland and Wales have always had their own parliaments and assemblies.

35. At least Mom and Dad had their new Nintendo 64 to help them get through long nights sitting up with the baby.

36. First Responders have always been heroes.

37. Sir Paul and Sir Elton have always been knights of the same musical roundtable.

38. CNN has always been available en Español.

39. Heaven’s Gate has always been more a trip to Comet Hale-Bopp and less a film flop.

40. Splenda has always been a sweet option in the U.S.

41. The Atlanta Braves have always played at Turner Field.

42. Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic have always been members of NATO.

43. Humans have always had the ability to use implanted radio frequency ID chips—slightly larger than a grain of rice.

44. TV has always been in such high definition that they could see the pores of actors and the grimaces of quarterbacks.

45. Mr. Jones and Mr. Smith have always been Men in Black, not their next-door neighbors.

46. The proud parents recorded their first steps on camcorders, mounted on their shoulders like bazookas.

47. They had no idea how fortunate they were to enjoy the final four years of Federal budget surpluses.

48. Amoco gas stations have steadily vanished from the American highway.

49. Vote-by-mail has always been the official way to vote in Oregon.

50. …and there has always been a Beloit College Mindset List.

 

I find this fascinating as I get older. We don’t think much about how they view the world. If you are in the world of marketing then these facts are some things you need to be paying attention to as you attempt to grab their piece of the pie. Marketing the 2019 College Graduates can be important.

St. Louis Cardinals History by the Decades- 1892-1899

 

St. Louis Cardinals History by the Decades- 1892-1899

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Every once in awhile I get the urge to delve into some of the history of the Cardinals and this time I decided to share it with others. Remember, I didn’t make anything up in these column as it is true facts that can be found with time and a search engine.

Let’s start at the beginning of its existence and proceed slowly from there.

 

                                                             -Tom

 

St. Louis was awarded a franchise in 1892 for a team to be known as the Browns. On April 12th the Browns open the season with a 14-10 loss to the Chicago Colts (later named the Cubs). The ballpark is called Sportsman’s Park and is located at Grand Avenue and Dodier Street.

 

The  St. Louis Browns played the first Sunday game in the National League on April 17th and lose 5-1 to Cincinnati. There had been other Sunday games but they were not in the National League. They were in the American Association (also known as the minor leagues).

The first season was split in half and the Browns were a poor team with a 31-42 record in the first half and 25-52 in the second half for an overall 56-94 record. They finished 11th out of 12 teams that season and was 46 games behind the first place Boston team. The first year saw the Browns have five different managers.

 

The second season (1893) saw the Browns open the season in a new ballpark known as Robison Field and it was located at the corner of Vandeventer and Natural Bridge. The Browns won the opener 4-2 over the Louisville Colonels.

Not much went on during the season as they finished 55-75 and in 10th place. They did lead the league in ERA with a 4.06 mark but had trouble scoring runs and fielding was an issue as they allowed more than two unearned runs per game. This was the first season the pitching rubber was moved to 60’6”.

 

The 1894 season wasn’t much better than previous years as they finished in 9th place, 35 games behind the NL Champion Baltimore club with a 56-76 record.If there were any highlights, it comes from the fact that Roger Connor finished the season with 25 triples. The Browns did hit six home runs in one game (May 10) but lost the game 18-9 to Cincinnati.

 

Four managers guided the 1895 team to a lowly 39-92 record and 11th place 48.5 games behind league winning Baltimore. Some notables this year are Roger Connor getting six hits in a game that saw the team knock out 30 hits against the Giants. Also, Tommy Dowd hit for the cycle to become the first player in franchise history to accomplish this feat.

 

Anger is the key in 1896 as owner Chris Von Der Ahe isn’t happy that one of his players is also an actor in a play when he should be preparing for the upcoming season. The player, Breitenstein, goes to a labor board and holds out for a bit to finish his acting season. He goes on to win 18 of the Browns 40 games but still is sold for $10,000 to Cincinnati at the completion of the season.

 

The Browns are bad in 1897 and attendance is weak because the team is solidly in last place. On May 23rd, Von Der Ahe has a waterslide installed at the park. It becomes a success and is more popular than the team.

On Sept. 2nd, the team won their last game of the season with a 4-3 win. The Browns go on to lose 18 games straight to finish the year. The Browns lose 100 games and win only 29 to finish a remarkable 63.5 games out of first place and 23.5 behind the team ahead of them.

 

Von Der Ahe has more troubles in 1898 as the Browns park burns down during a game (April 16) against the Chicago Orphans and it also destroys his saloon. Several people were injured in the fire which resulted in lawsuits being filed. Between re-building the stadium and paying off his other creditors, it spell the financial ruins of Von Der Ahe. This will lead to his exit from the ownership.

The day after the fire (April 17) many fans, players and carpenters decide to rebuild the park and are insistent the team will not miss a game. The Chicago Orphans take a 10-1 win as many players are worn out from staying up all night trying to get the park in order. They commit 11 errors in the game.  The St. Louis Browns finish 39-111 and are 63.5 games out of first place.

 

The 1899 season find new owners, Matthew Robison and Frank Robison, taking over the team. They are also owners of the Cleveland Spiders and decide to bring some of their best players over to the Browns. Cy Young, Jesse Burkett and Bobby Wallace are now property of the St. Louis ball club.

April 15th finds the team replacing the color Brown with Red and it is used on the uniforms along with a new nickname. The team is now called the Perfectos. The season opens with excitement with some wins but ends with disappointment.

The first winning season is St. Louis is in the books with a 84-64 record. After the season, reporter William McHale gives a suggestion to the Robison brothers to name the team Cardinals. After some consideration, the name is changed!

 

Decade Record: 361-615

Next up: 1900-1909

 

Anger, Domestic Violence and Football- Are they Connected?

 

Football is awesome, right? We can’t get enough of it in this country. It’s a year-round obsession, even though the regular season is only 16 games spanning three or four months.

Each game is hyped and treated as if they are a can’t miss event featuring some of the best athletes in the world. Those athletes can (and do) put on quite a show on the field on Sundays. Everybody is entertained, the curtain falls and we get back to reality. So do the athletes. And that’s where things have gotten convoluted.

I’m sure that you have heard of the rash of domestic violence incidences plaguing the National Football League over the past year or so. A seemingly endless parade of football players that cannot seem to avoid involvement in one domestic violence issue or another.

Ray Rice, Ray McDonald, Greg Hardy, Bruce Miller and others, the list goes on and on. Too many athletes have made headlines for assaulting women, allegedly or otherwise. The recent outcry against this trend (that apparently has been ongoing in the NFL for years) has reached a tipping point loud enough to prompt stricter punishments and policies from the league regarding its players.

But that outcry was sorely misdirected.

Why do we look to these sports leagues for accountability in matters like these? At what point did we have elevate these athletes to such lofty positions that we should look to them to be moral beacons of our society? It’s a contradiction of wants and desires; on the field, we want you to be as competitive and rough and tumble as the rules allow.

Be aggressive. Do whatever you can (within the rules) to win.

But the instant those qualities manifest themselves negatively in their social lives, we collectively wag our morally righteous fingers at them. How could you do such things, we say to them. They should know better. They have a responsibility to the kids that look up to them, that want to be like them.

Since when? Do you know who is actually responsible for being a responsible example for the kids? Their parents. Their teachers. The people that occupy actual positions of authority in their lives. Those athletes don’t have a “responsibility” outside of being a productive member of society, and if they run afoul of the law that governs us all, they should be punished accordingly.

Speaking of which, what confused me most was the lack of outcry against our justice system. Where was it? Why is there no chorus of change being directed at the lawmakers and those charged with upholding laws against domestic violence? It felt like pointing the finger at the NFL was a case of low hanging fruit, whereas addressing the laws against domestic violence is a fight for a day that rarely comes.

That’s what the law is for, to handle people that step out of line. That’s where we need to be directing our desire for change, not these athletes. They don’t owe us anything other than a good performance.

 

You Have the Right to Speak…and So Do I.

 

Political correctness is formally known by Oxford Dictionaries as “the avoidance, often considered as taken to extremes, of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against.” From politicians (or attempted politicians) such as Donald Trump to reality TV stars like Phil Robertson of “Duck Dynasty,”  many claim to have been “victimized” by the “political correctness police.”

Countless people interpret society’s focus on political correctness as an attack on freedom of speech, a cornerstone of our society. Many would argue that no matter how harmful one’s opinions are – whether it be a politician or silly reality TV star – they have the right to say what they feel and shouldn’t have to edit their opinions out of concern for the possible implications of their statements, especially if those views are shared by a significant portion of the general population.

A quote by Voltaire comes to mind in the midst of this debate: “I disapprove of what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it.” And I, like Voltaire, will do the same. We, as Americans, and as a free society, should defend our right to speak how we feel without being persecuted by authorities. In America, one absolutely should have the right to express oneself.

We, as human beings capable of rational thought, are more than welcome to hold any viewpoint, no matter how bigoted, racist, sexist, classist or any other “-ist” you can conjure up. We are more than welcome to express those views.

However, as human beings capable of rational thought, when we express those views we must expect a strict review of those thoughts by our peers. You may have the right to say something, but I have the right to challenge it. And this is where the concept of political correctness kicks in.

Look through any newspaper, book or other source of media from 100 years ago.You are practically guaranteed to find rampant examples of any type of “-ism” you can think of. Look through any of sources of media today and you’ll mostly find criticisms of those characteristics. Is it because of the overreaching tyranny of the PC police?

Is it because we as a society have realized that our language has power, and if we rampantly use language that harms marginalized members of our society, we set up a social system that allows verbal abuse, thereby leading to the institutionalized marginalization of racial minorities, women, the LGBT community and the disabled?

Or perhaps it’s because Americans have developed a greater sense of empathy for our fellow peers, and through history, social interaction and media, have realized the pain we inflict on them with the use of harmful language. I personally believe it’s a combination of the latter two influences. I believe we have realized the power of language and developed a larger sense of compassion for our fellow man. Political correctness is the realization that our words are a collective representation of our progress as a society.

While we all have the right to say what we feel, we must be wary of the social repercussions of our words – whether it’s the harm they cause to others or the negative consequences we inflict on ourselves. We must realize that freedom of speech is not freedom from consequence or backlash from our peers. Freedom of speech may guarantee your right to say what you feel, but human nature guarantees that harmful ideologies will be challenged by those who disagree. And while I may fight for your right to speak harmful words, I will fight just as vigorously for my right to speak up as well.

24-hrs of College Basketball

 

Get it on your calendar.

The schedule for the 24-hour Tip-Off Marathon:

Mon., Nov. 16

5:30 p.m.: No. 1 UConn at No. 13 Ohio State (women) ESPN2
7:30 p.m.: No. 4 Virginia at George Washington ESPN2
9:00 p.m.: Kennesaw State at LSU ESPNU
9:30 p.m.: San Diego State at No. 13 Utah ESPN2
11:30 p.m.: No. 17 Baylor at Oregon ESPN2

Tue., Nov. 17

1:45 a.m.: BYU at Long Beach State ESPN2
4:00 a.m.: Nevada at Hawaii ESPN2
6:00 a.m.: Green Bay at East Tennessee State ESPN2
8:00 a.m.: Stephen F. Austin at Northern Iowa ESPN2
10:00 a.m.: Valparaiso at Rhode Island ESPN2
1:00 p.m.: Alabama at Dayton ESPN
3:00 p.m.: Colorado at Auburn ESPN
5:00 p.m.: No. 8 Oklahoma at Memphis ESPN
7:30 p.m.: No. 3 Kentucky vs. No. 6 Duke (Chicago) ESPN
9:00 p.m.: Georgetown at No. 1 Maryland ESPN2
10:00 p.m.: No. 5 Kansas vs. No. 19 Michigan State (Chicago) ESPN

 

College Basketball- Top 50 Players Preview- #49

Time to move on to the 49th projected best player in college basketball for 2015-16.

 

 

#49 Markus Kennedy- SMU

Parents are Roysall Kennedy and Barbara Kennedy … Has a brother Mikeal and sister Morgan … Coached by Jason Smith at Brewster Academy … Played AAU basketball for the New England Playaz.

from SMU website:

2014-15 (Junior): Played in 24 games… Averaged 11.9 pts & 6.3 rebs… 27 asts… 33 stls… 10+ pts in 14 games… NCAA TOURNAMENT: 16 pts (6-13 FG, 4-6 FT), 9 rebs & 2 stls vs. UCLA (March 19)…

AAC TOURNAMENT: 15 pts (4-9 FG, 7-14 FT), 6 rebs, 3 stls, 2 asts & 1 blk vs. East Carolina (Quarterfinal – March 13)… 17pts (4-7 FG, 9-12 FT), 9 rebs & 1 ast vs. Temple (Semifinal – March 14)… 15pts (5-10 FG, 5-6 FT), 6 rebs, 1 blk & 1 stl vs. UConn (Final – March 15)…

REGULAR SEASON: 16 pts (6-8 FG, 4-6 FT), 7 rebs, 3 blks, 2 stls & 1 ast vs. Tulsa (March 8)… 18 pts (7-12 FG, 4-7 FT), 9 rebs, 1 stl at UConn (March 1)… Career-high 6 stls at Memphis (Feb. 26)… 13 pts (5-10 FG, 3-5 FT), 8 rebs, 3 asts, 2 blks & 1 stl vs. UConn (Feb. 14)… 13 pts (5-9 FG, 3-3 FT), 11 rebs, 2 blks, 1 ast & 1 stl vs. UCF (Jan. 31)… Career-high 22 pts (10-12 FG, 2-3 FT), 7 rebs, 2 asts & 1 stl at USF (Jan. 28)… 21 pts (9-11 FG, 3-3 FG), 7 rebs & 1 ast at Temple (Jan. 14)… 21 pts (10-13 FG, 1-2 FT), 3 rebs, 2 stls & 1 ast vs. Memphis (Jan. 8)…

AWARDS: NABC All-District Second Team… AAC Tournament MOP… AAC Sixth Man of the Year… All-AAC Second Team… AAC Player of the Week (Feb. 2)… AAC Weekly Honor Roll (March 9, Jan. 19, Feb. 16)… Preseason All-AAC First Team (Oct. 29).

 

2013-14 (Sophomore) – Played in all 37 games, starting 22, averaging 12.4 points, 7.1 rebounds, 1.2 blocks, 1.5 steals and 1.6 assists in 25.0 minutes. In conference play, averaged 13.2 points, 7.6 rebounds, 1.8 steals, 1.8 assists and 1.4 blocks…

CONFERENCE RANKINGS:5th in FG% (53.4), 13th in blocked shots (1.2), 6th in rebounding (7.1) 5th in defensive rebounds (5.1) …

NATIONAL RANKINGS: 93rd in total rebounds (261) and 79th in total steals (57) .

AWARDS: NIT All-Tournament Team NABC District 25 Second Team. American Athletic Conference Second Team – American Athletic Conference Honor Roll four times (12/23, 1/20, 1/27, 3/3).

STREAKS: Led (or tied the lead) SMU in scoring and rebounding in the same game 12 times this season. Scored in double figures in 14-straight games (Dec. 4-Feb. 1) and recorded 5 double-doubles in that stretch.

GAME HIGHLIGHTS: Scored a career-high 21 points to go along with 9 rebounds in SMU’s NIT Semifinal win over Clemson. Tallied his sixth double-double of the season in SMU’s NIT Quarterfinal win over California, netting 19 points to go along with 10 rebounds. Scored a career-high 21 points to go along with a career-high 15 rebounds in SMU’s home win over No 22/22 Memphis . Went 10-10 from the field in the win over Memphis, the first to do so since Papa Dia against Southern Miss in Jan., 2011. Recorded his first career double-double, scoring a career-high 18 points to go along with a career-high 10 rebounds, a career-high four steals and three assists in 28 minutes against USF. Led the Mustangs in points, rebounds, blocks and steals at Cincinnati, scoring 12, hauling in 9 rebounds, while adding 3 blocks and 2 steals. Went 8-8 from the free-throw line against Sam Houston State. Tallied four points, four rebounds, one block and a steal in his SMU debut against TCU.

CAREER RANKINGS: 7th in blocked shots average (1.1) and 8th in steals average (1.5) .

SEASON RANKINGS:16th in blocked shots (44), 11th in steals (57) and 19th in rebounds (261).

2012-13 (Transfer): Sat out due to NCAA transfer rules.

2011-12 (Freshman at Villanova): Averaged 3.0 points and 4.4 rebounds per contest in 31 games

 

 

SEASON TEAM G MIN FG FGA FG% FG3 FG3A FG3% FT FTA FT% PTS AVG
2011-12 Villanova 31 458 46 101 45.5 1 2 50 1 16 6.3 94 3
2013-14 SMU 37 924 182 341 53.4 1 5 20 93 158 58.9 458 12.4
2014-15 SMU 24 551 108 197 54.8 0 3 0 70 109 64.2 286 11.9

 

Previous Previews:

#50 Rico Gathers- Baylor

2015 College Football Top 25 Preview- #24

#24 Boise State Broncos
Head Coach: Bryan Harsin
2014 record: 12-2 overall, 7-1 Mountain West Mountain
2014 Postseason results: Beat Arizona 38-30 in the Fiesta Bowl
2015 returning starters: 9 offense, 8 defense

Think on this. Boise State has not lost more than two games in a season for the past seven years. This may be the best year yet for them.

The quarterback was likely to be sophomore Ryan Finley but that may be in question as he was arrested for illegal consumption , resisting arrest and that could lead to disciplinary action from the university. Tommy Stuart, redshirt freshman Alex Ogle, and true freshman Brett Rypien are also in the mix for the starting job. None have college game experience though. Rypien is the nephew of former Washington Redskins quarterback Mark Rypien.

Jay Ajayi is gone to the NFL along with 347 carries, 28 touchdowns and 1,823 yards. Sophomore Jeremy McNichols is the expected to replace Ajayi. He played both receiver and running back last season. He rushed for 159 yards with a touchdown, and also had 15 catches for 155 yards and a touchdown. Kelsey Young,a graduate transfer from Stanford is eligible to play for Boise State this season. He was the second leading rusher for the Cardinal in 2014 with 331 yards. He has a younger brother Cory that will also get some playing time.

 

 

Previous Posts- #25 Mississippi State

 

 

 

 I see this team continuing their winning ways and may go undefeated for the entire season. It will be hard to do so I am going with an 11-1 final record. BOISE STATE 2015 SCHEDULESep. 5 – Washington
Sep. 12 – at Brigham Young
Sep. 19 – Idaho State
Sep. 26 – at Virginia
TBA – Air Force
TBA – Hawai’i
TBA – New Mexico
TBA – Wyoming
TBA – at Colorado State
TBA – at San Jose State
TBA – at UNLV
TBA – at Utah State